JwumaJwumaCorpshore AI recruits, vets, trains, manages and pays the people behind your training data, across 18+ countries and 35+ languages, including the ones your current vendors won't quote on. You submit a spec and review the work. We do everything else.
Commercial terms enforced in software. Review clocks, cure windows, prepaid balances and country restrictions.
Marketplaces hand you a pool of strangers and a rating system. We recruit into specific projects, train against your rubric, review every submission internally and carry the employment and payment burden ourselves.
You define the standard. It's frozen at the moment a batch begins, taught to contributors in onboarding, applied by internal QA and used as the reference for every rejection reason you write back. A batch is never judged against a moving target, which means your acceptance rate actually means something over time.
Review clocks, deemed acceptance, rejection caps and cure windows are enforced by the platform, not by a contract nobody reads.
Contributor PII sits in its own regional database. Nothing is pooled into a single global store by default.
Every mutation writes an audit row. Access reviews, change logs and incident history are collected continuously and bulk exports need approval from two different administrators.
Contributors are paid on our QA acceptance, not your review timeline. Automation can flag and hold, but only humans can reject or ban. These aren't policies we market. They're constraints in the system.
Three task families in production today, each with its own QA chain and quality metrics.
Commission real-world photography from contributors physically present in the markets you care about. Street signage, retail shelves, produce, vehicles, informal storefronts. The categories that are thin in every scraped dataset.
We are operators rather than a marketplace. The delivery centres are ours, the teams in them are employed by our local entities, and one accountable SLA runs from collection through to delivery.
Pricing varies by engagement and is finalised with our team before anything starts. Once agreed, the terms that usually live in a PDF nobody enforces are implemented directly in the platform, so both sides can see the clock, the balance and the thresholds at all times.
Most engagements combine two of these and change shape over time. Talk to our team and we will scope the structure that fits your work.
Each delivery arrives with a countdown you can see in the portal, configured per contract. If it expires without a decision, the batch is deemed accepted automatically. So contributors aren't left unpaid indefinitely and your team has a predictable SLA in both directions. The clock is enforced in software, not by a rep chasing you.
You reject with a reason tied to the frozen rubric. That routes the work back to the original contributor inside a cure window, so it gets corrected rather than silently rewritten by someone else. If your rejection rate crosses a configured threshold, a calibration trigger fires. Usually a sign the rubric needs clarifying rather than the workers.
It varies by engagement, and there is no single published rate card. Depending on what you are running we price per accepted task, per project, per hour, per delivered batch, per field assignment or as a monthly retainer for a dedicated team. Most engagements combine two of these. A pilot priced per task, then a retainer once volume is steady. What fits your work is agreed with our team before anything starts, and the agreed structure is what the portal then meters against.
Sometimes, and it depends on how much has to be built before the first task can run. Work that reuses an existing pipeline usually has none. Work that needs a bespoke rubric, a custom tool, a recruited and trained language cohort or a dedicated onsite hub carries a one-off setup or onboarding fee covering that build. Where a fee applies we tell you what it covers and what it buys before you commit, and it is quoted as a line item rather than folded into the unit price.
Per accepted task work runs on a prepaid balance that draws down as tasks are accepted, visible in the portal in real time with a low balance warning before it becomes a problem. Deemed accepted work is billed the same way, because we do not treat an expired clock as free labour. Project, hourly, retainer and field arrangements are invoiced on the schedule in your contract, monthly or against milestones, rather than metered from a balance. Both settle through the same commercial agreement.
Yes, and most clients do. Engagements commonly start per task while scope is still moving, then shift to a project fee or a monthly retainer once the work is predictable and a stable team is in place. Changing the structure is a contract amendment agreed with our team, not a support ticket and it takes effect from an agreed date rather than retroactively.
Yes. Set an allow list or a deny list per project and it's enforced at task assignment, not just documented in a contract. Presets exist for common compliance regimes and a platform-wide sanctions layer applies underneath your settings regardless.
No. Clients never see contributor identities or pay rates. That separation is structural, not a setting. You see the work, the quality metrics and the delivery timeline. We handle the workforce.
Dataset packaging exports your accepted deliveries with SHA-256 checksums via signed download URLs, with every export logged. You can also pull work programmatically through the API with an issued key.
Corpshore AI is the AI data operations arm of Corpshore Solutions. We employ embedded local teams across 18+ countries and own the physical infrastructure behind field collection, which is what lets us take single-SLA accountability from collection through QA to delivery.
That operator model is the difference between commissioning work and posting it to a marketplace. It is also what earned the Top 5 placement in the Outsource Accelerator 2026 ranking, above Scale AI.
Corpshore operates through local legal entities, not contractor networks. Each has its own site, its own team and its own payroll. That is what makes 18+ countries a supply chain rather than a claim.
Select a pin to see the languages we recruit for there, what work runs and how contributors are paid.
Third-party coverage of how Corpshore operates. Every link goes to the publisher's own article, not a reprint.
Corpshore Talent launches AI recruiting across 10 countries with human oversight built for compliance as global AI hiring regulations tighten.
Outsource Accelerator →
Corpshore Exams announced its six-signal AI fusion proctoring engine as the first exam integrity platform purpose-built for agentic AI cheating detection.
Outsource Accelerator →
Corpshore Talent formally launched a global talent operations platform claiming to be the first provider to combine native multilingual delivery.
Outsource Accelerator →
Corpshore AI announced its positioning as the human-in-the-loop data and operations partner for agentic AI platforms.
Outsource Accelerator →
Corpshore Solutions Corporation has launched Corpshore AI, a new division targeting the global market for AI training data.
Outsource Accelerator →
Corpshore Solutions has officially launched its AI operations hub in Kenya, marking a significant step in the company's expansion across East Africa.
Outsource Accelerator →Submit a spec, sample and volume through the portal. Once an admin converts it into a project and sets the review chain, tasks are generated and open to qualified contributors immediately. Projects needing a new onboarding course or a bespoke rubric take longer to stand up than ones reusing an existing skill pool.
Every task passes internal QA before it ever reaches your delivery queue. You are the second reviewer, not the first. Beyond that you get acceptance rate, overrule rate, throughput and average handling time per project, plus gold tasks and consensus review where a batch warrants it.
Capture, transcription and evaluation run natively in the platform. For image and video annotation, the task engine is built against a pluggable tool interface. Talk to us about what you're already using before assuming a migration.
Application, a structured written interview scored against a staff-authored rubric and a project-specific onboarding course with a gating assessment. Automation assists scoring but never rejects anyone. Every final decision is made by a person and logged.
Contributor PII lives in region-partitioned databases. Your project data, deliveries and exports are scoped to your organisation and staff access is role-gated and audit-logged. Bulk exports require dual approval from two different administrators.
Yes, OIDC single sign-on per client organisation, configured by a platform admin against your identity provider. Users are scoped to your organisation specifically, so a matching email at another tenant can never cross over.
Submit work requests, review deliveries under the clock, track your balance and export accepted datasets. Access is by invitation. If your organisation isn't set up yet, talk to us first.
Enterprise organisations can sign in through their own identity provider. Use organisation SSO.
Sign in with your organisation's SSO
Client access is set up by our team rather than self-serve, so there is nothing to sign up for here. Book a call and we will scope the work and create your organisation, usually in the same week.
Bring a spec, a sample or just the problem. We'll tell you honestly whether we can source it, what it would take and what it would cost.